MARYLOU SUPPA, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Timmons v. State, 961 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …Ct. 1682. We thus conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress, and we affirm the conviction and sentence. GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur. . We conclude that the issue is appealable as dispositive, see Peña v. State, 913 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), even though the trial court inadvertently failed to announce its dis-positive nature, although requested to do so by defense counsel. Hawk v. State, 848 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Humphrey v. State, 909 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2d…
• Torrey Lenard Sloss v. State, 917 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
  …re to reserve the right to appeal the denial of his motions for discharge is itself insufficient to establish appellate jurisdiction. It is well-settled that subject matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred by agreement of the parties. Pena v. State, 913 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (stipulation in plea agreement that defendant could plead no contest reserving the right to appeal denial of his motion to participate in drug court did not confer appellate jurisdiction). Where an appeal is dismissed because th…
• Batista v. State, 951 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …nize that denial of a hearing on a matter concerning termination of pre-trial intervention is not a dispositive order and, thus, not appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2) (A)(i). As this court recognized in Pena v. State, 913 So. 2d 1203, 1204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), In this context, an “issue is legally dis-positive ‘only if, regardless of whether the appellate court affirms or reverses the lower court’s decision, there will be no trial of the case.’ ” Levine v. State, 788 So. 2d 379…

Authorities Cited

• Santoya Walls v. State, 910 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)