EDDIE DANIELS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2005-12-13
No. 5D04-3434
THOMPSON, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
917 So. 2d 245 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Schuck, 913 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Ivory v. State, 898 So. 2d 184, 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

THOMPSON, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jerold Parker v. State, 934 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996); see also Daniels v. State, 917 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (citing State v. Schuck, 913 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)). GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw