LISA M. OKOH, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES I. OKOH, APPELLEE
LISA M. OKOH, APPELLANT,
JAMES I. OKOH, APPELLEE
918 So. 2d 316
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
SALCINES, Judge.
In this difficult case, we are bound by the standard of review, which is whether the trial court’s decision to set aside or uphold a marital settlement agreement was supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Hjortaas v. McCabe, 656 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Maas v. Maas, 440 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). We cannot reweigh the evidence, and the record does not reflect that the trial court committed reversible error. Accordingly, the trial court’s order on the enforceability of the written marital settlement agreement is affirmed.
Affirmed.
WHATLEY and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hicks v. Hicks, 962 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)…PER CURIAM. The trial court’s order enforcing the parties’ prenuptial and marital settlement agreements was supported by competent, substantial evidence. An appellate court is not permitted to reweigh the evidence. Okoh v. Okoh, 918 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). AFFIRMED. PLEUS, LAWSON, EVANDER, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Maas v. Maas, 440 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
- Hjortaas v. McCABE, 656 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)