LORI HICKS, APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES HICKS, APPELLEE
LORI HICKS, APPELLANT,
CHARLES HICKS, APPELLEE
962 So. 2d 975
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial court’s order enforcing the parties’ prenuptial and marital settlement agreements was supported by competent, substantial evidence. An appellate court is not permitted to reweigh the evidence. Okoh v. Okoh, 918 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, LAWSON, EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.M. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 24 So. 3d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)…s, generally, that the trial court ruled as it did only because it was deceived by the testimony of her mother, who currently has custody of the two children. Although R.M. asks us to reweigh the evidence, we cannot do so. See, e.g., Hicks v. Hicks, 962 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). It is the trial court’s role to assess the credibility of witnesses when sitting as the trier of fact. See, e.g., Dingess v. State, 8 So. 3d 444 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order. AFFIRMED.…
Authorities Cited
- Okoh v. Okoh, 918 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)