CHARLES TONGE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed Tonge's convictions for armed burglary and grand theft, holding that evidence of his possession of coins stolen from the victim's home was sufficient to permit a jury to reject his claim that someone else stole the firearm.
Evidence that the defendant possessed coins stolen from the victim's home, which were stored in the same box as the victim's gun, was sufficient to permit a jury to reject the defendant's hypothesis that someone else stole the firearm.
[1] Evidence of a defendant's possession of property stolen from a victim's home is sufficient to permit a jury to reject the defendant's claim that a co-perpetrator committe…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCharles Tonge was arrested in possession of coins that the victim identified as coming from a coin collection stolen from the victim's home. The victi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Grand Theft Of A Firearm cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this direct appeal, Charles Tonge challenges his judgment and sentence for armed burglary of a dwelling, grand theft of a firearm, and grand theft. We decline to address his claims alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. See Corzo v. State, 806 So. 2d 642, 645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). We affirm as to his remaining claims, only one of which warrants discussion.
Citing this court’s decision in McKinney v. State, 796 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), Tonge argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the armed burglary and grand theft of a firearm charges. We disagree. Although the evidence here may have supported Tonge’s hypotheses of innocence that someone else at some other time entered the victim’s house and stole the gun, in this case, unlike McKinney, the State offered evidence that would be sufficient to permit a jury to reject Tonge’s claim. See State v. Law, 559 So. 2d 187, 188 (Fla.1989). In particular, when Tonge was arrested, he had in his possession coins that the victim identified as having come from the coin collection stolen from his home. The victim testified that those coins were stored in a box he kept in his closet and that he stored his gun and ammunition in the same box. We conclude that this evidence distinguishes this case from McKinney and that it is sufficient to permit a jury to reject Tonge’s claim that while he may have taken the coins, someone else at some other time took the gun.
Affirmed.
STRINGER, SILBERMAN, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Ronnie S. LAW, 559 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1989)
- Corzo v. State, 806 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- McKINNEY v. State, 796 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)