B.F., APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, APPELLEE
B.F., APPELLANT,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, APPELLEE
929 So. 2d 620
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final judgment terminating the mother’s parental rights given that the judgment was supported by clear and convincing evidence and that termination was the least restrictive means of protecting the minor child. See J.R. v. Dept, of Children and Families, 754 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(affirming termination of parental rights where clear and convincing evidence showed that mother failed to substantially comply with case plan); In re T.M., 641 So. 2d 410, 412-13 (Fla. 1994)(least restrictive means analysis requires only that state prove good faith effort to rehabilitate parent and unify family by providing case plan and related services).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
C.G. v. The Dep't OF Child. & Families & The Guardian ad Litem Program, 67 So. 3d 1141 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…tate’s good faith effort and to determine the best interest of the child. Id.; N.S. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 36 So. 3d 776, 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), [*1144] review denied, 46 So. 3d 566 (Fla.2010); B.F. v. Dep’t of Children and Family Servs., 929 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). The record shows that the Mother was assigned five different reunification plans over a two-year period. Each plan required C.G. to maintain a job and secure safe, consistent housing, to undergo regular mental health evaluations…
-
C.C. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families & The Guardian Ad Litem Program, 994 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 39.810(1), Fla. Stat.; B.F. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 929 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); In re T.M., 641 So. 2d 410, 412-13 (Fla.1994).…
-
Electo Echevarria v. State, 976 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…re 3.850. We affirm in part and reverse in part. Defendant-appellant Electo Echevarria was convicted of first-degree murder and other offenses and was sentenced to life in prison. This conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Echevarria v. State, 929 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). The defendant filed a motion for post-conviction relief. In claim five, the defendant alleged that his counsel was ineffective for failing to call codefendant Pedro Rodriguez, also known as “Pichi,” as a defense witness at his…
Authorities Cited
- In the Interest of T.M. and F.M., 641 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1994)
- J.R. v. Dep't OF Child. & Fam. Servs. & The Guardian Ad Litem, 754 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)