C.C., APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, APPELLEES
C.C., APPELLANT,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, APPELLEES
994 So. 2d 1231
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 39.810(1), Fla. Stat.; B.F. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 929 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); In re T.M., 641 So. 2d 410, 412-13 (Fla.1994).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tatum v. State, 27 So. 3d 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…anting the motion. McIntosh v. State, 914 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Because the trial court has not yet taken either course, we grant the motion and direct the trial court to promptly comply with our previously-issued mandate. Tatum v. State, 994 So. 2d 1231, 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). On August 11, 2009, the trial court denied Tatum’s motion for yet a third time: [*704] PETITIONER LORENZO TATUM complains that the sentencing guidelines were miscalculated at the time of his guilty plea. Petitioner has fil…
-
Castillo v. State, 13 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…urned to the trial court, the court again summarily denied the Rule 3.850 motion, but did not attach any record excerpts conclusively refuting the claim. We reverse the order now before us, and remand for an eviden-tiary hearing. See Tatum v. State, 994 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). The State’s response filed in this court argues that the defendant has an additional conviction for purchase or possession of cannabis and that this offense independently makes the defendant subject to deportation. The defendan…
Authorities Cited
- In the Interest of T.M. and F.M., 641 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1994)
- B.F. v. Fla. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 929 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)