RUDOLPH MAXWELL, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Smith Thomas v. State, 958 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
  …responses does not [*1050] disqualify that juror for service, the trial court , must excuse a prospective juror for cause if any reasonable doubt exists regarding his or her ability to render an impartial verdict. Id. at 96; see also Suri v. State, 937 So. 2d 216, 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). On the other hand, if the juror declares and the court determines that the juror can render an impartial verdict according to the evidence, a challenge for cause should not be granted. Dorsey v. Reddy, 931 So. 2d 259, 265 (F…
• Wilbon v. State, 943 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850; Maxwell v. State, 937 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).…
• Embleton v. Senatus, 993 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …the courtroom during all parts of the trial raised a reasonable doubt as to her ability to be fair and impartial. This specific ground, however, was not raised during voir dire and therefore was not preserved for appellate review. See Suri v. State, 937 So. 2d 216, 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (holding that the argument that the juror’s responses were equivocal was not raised before the trial court and thus not preserved); see also Maxwell v. State, 443 So. 2d 967, 970 (Fla.1983) (noting that the objection must cle…

Authorities Cited

• Walls v. State, 926 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 2006)