CHRISTOPHER WILBON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Pozos, 242 So. 3d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
  …ee, e.g., Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850, 851 n. 2 (Fla. 1992) ; State, Dep't of Envtl. Prot. v. Garcia, 99 So. 3d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) ; Castillo v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co., 57 So. 3d 965 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) ; Taggart v. Morgan, 943 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). However, Article V, section 4(b) of the Florida Constitution authorizes district courts of appeal to review interlocutory orders of the circuit court "to the extent provided by rules adopted by the supreme court." The Florida Sup…
• State of Fla. Dep't OF Env't Prot. v. Garcia, 99 So. 3d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …jurisdiction. See Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Perez, 988 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that denial of County’s motion for summary judgment was a non-appealable non-final order and did not meet criteria for review via certio-rari); Taggart v. Morgan, 943 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (stating rules of appellate procedure do not permit interlocutory appeals of non-final orders denying motions for summary judgment); Harte v. Palm Beach Biltmore Condo. Ass’n, 436 So. 2d 444, 445 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (holding that…
• Castillo v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co., 57 So. 3d 965 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
  …diction. With regard to the order denying summary judgment, interlocutory appeals of non-final orders denying motions for summary judgment are not permitted under the rules of appellate procedure. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3); Taggart v. Morgan, 943 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Additionally, with regard to the order granting summary judgment, the order appealed “is merely authorization for a final judgment. It does not constitute a final judgment, nor is it an order from which an interlocutory appeal…

Authorities Cited

• Maxwell v. State, 937 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)