BENITO BENAVIDES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Presidents' Council OF SD, Inc. v. Walton Cnty., 36 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …’ failure to bring their circuit court action within the time allowed under section 163.3215(3) is a jurisdictional defect, upon which summary judgment was properly entered as to the section 163.3215 action. See 5220 Biscayne Blvd., LLC v. Stebbins, 937 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Although the order in 5220 Biscayne was rendered when filed with the City Clerk, that order was entered upon approval by the City Commission and under signature of the mayor, rather than by an official for another administrative…
• Dunlap v. Orange Cnty., 971 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …explicitly provides the right to a de novo “action,” not to a more limited appellate action. As such, the trial court’s ruling dismissing the homeowners’ amended complaint on the basis of waiver is reversed. See 5220 Biscayne Blvd., LLC v. Stebbins, 937 So. 2d 1189, 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)(explaining that the “2002 amendment to section 163.3215 was intended to simplify the time limit for bringing the de novo action to challenge a development order by requiring that the action be filed within thirty days of ren…

Authorities Cited

• Gethers v. State, 838 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 2003)