LIONEL D. BOWDEN, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Gabby Tennis v. State, 997 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 2008)
  …and our rule 3.111(d) require a reversal when there is not a proper Faretta inquiry.”); Rodriguez v. State, 982 So. 2d 1272, 1274 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that court’s failure to conduct Faretta hearing was reversible error); Goldsmith v. State, 937 So. 2d 1253, 1256-57 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (holding that the denial of the right of self-representation is not amenable to harmless error analysis). The State alternatively argues that the trial court acted properly in denying Tennis’s pro se request because the…
• Laramee v. State, 90 So. 3d 341 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)
  …r rule 3.111(d) require a reversal when there is not a proper Faretta inquiry.”); Rodriguez v. State, 982 So. 2d 1272, 1274 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that court's failure to conduct Faretta hearing was reversible error); [*345] Goldsmith v. State, 937 So. 2d 1253, 1256-57 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (holding that denial of right of self-representation is not amenable to harmless error analysis). . We recognize that it is error for a trial court to permit a witness who is expected to invoke the Fifth Amendment to be…
• Flournoy v. State, 47 So. 3d 403 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …e trial court’s failure to hold a Faretta hearing resulted in per se reversible error, and our review is not amenable to a harmless error analysis. See Tennis, 997 So. 2d at 379; State v. Young, 626 So. 2d 655, 656-57 (Fla.1993); Goldsmith v. State, 937 So. 2d 1253, 1257 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Accordingly, because the trial court failed to conduct any Faret-ta inquiry and because we are constrained by the language in Tennis, Young, and Goldsmith, we reverse Flournoy’s judgment and sentences and remand for further…

Authorities Cited

• Barber v. State, 901 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)