WILLIAM E. TEAL, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2006-10-05
No. SC04-102
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
940 So. 2d 1103 Florida Supreme Court (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that community control is a sentence for purposes of the habitual felony offender statute's sequential conviction requirement.


Facts & Procedural History

The Second District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Fourth District Court of Appeal regarding whether community control constitutes a 'sen…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Teal v. State, 862 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Richardson v. State, 884 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), reh’g granted in part, 884 So. 2d 950, 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), quashed, 915 So. 2d 86 (Fla.2005). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We recently quashed the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Richardson and clarified that the sanction of probation is a “sentence” for purposes of applying the sequential conviction requirement of the habitual felony offender statute, section 775.084(5), Florida Statutes (1999). See State v. Richardson, 915 So. 2d 86 (Fla.2005).

The present case involves the sanction of community control. For the same reasons that we found probation to be a “sentence” in Richardson, we hold that the sanction of community control is a “sentence” for purposes of applying the sequential conviction requirement. Accordingly, we approve the decision by the Second District Court of Appeal in Teal.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nesbitt v. State, 946 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
    …hardson. Richardson clarified that the sanction of probation is a “sentence” for purposes of applying the sequential conviction requirement of the habitual felony offender statute, section 775.084(5), Florida Statutes (1999). See also Teal v. State, 940 So. 2d 1103 (Fla.2006) (applying Richardson to a community control sanction). Otherwise stated, the sanctions of both probation and community control are “sentences” for purposes of applying the sequential conviction requirement of the habitual offender statute…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw