PROPHET PAULCIN, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
PROPHET PAULCIN, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
941 So. 2d 421
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner is the defendant in a criminal case pending in the circuit court and seeks review of certain interlocutory orders. These orders are reviewable on plenary appeal after imposition of judgment and sentence. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari and/or prohibition is denied. See Mingle v. State, 429 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).
PETITION DENIED.
ERVIN and POLSTON, JJ., concur; HAWKES, J., concurs in result only.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Leslie v. Carnival Corp., 22 So. 3d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…. Carnival Corp., 930 So. 2d 776, 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (affirming trial court order that declined to “transfer” to United States District Court an action that had been dismissed under identical forum-selection clause); Carnival Corp. v. Middleton, 941 So. 2d 421, 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (issuing writ of prohibition quashing order of trial court, which had “re-instated” a personal injury action that previously had been dismissed on the basis of identical forum-selection clause). II. Carnival Has Not Unlawful…1 / 2
-
Leslie v. Carnival Corp., 22 So. 3d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…addition, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has found adequate notice in a passenger ticket containing the same forum selection clause as challenged by the plaintiffs in this case. See Carnival Corp. v. Middleton, 941 So. 2d 421, 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (acknowledging that the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida had enforced a forum-selection clause identical to the one before us over an objection based upon inadequate jury waiver). The guiding…
-
Wiesenberg v. Costa Crociere, 35 So. 3d 910 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…issal of the 2006 federal action on the basis of the statute of limitations was res judicata and compelled dismissal of the 2004 state court action. Costa argued that this result was compelled by this court’s decision in Carnival Corp. v. Middleton, 941 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), which in turn followed Allie v. Ionata, 503 So. 2d 1237 (Fla.1987). The trial court accepted Costa’s argument and dismissed the action. The plaintiff has appealed. We conclude that the trial court erred in its ruling. Costa argu…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Carmine Amato v. Amato, 429 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- Mingle v. State, 429 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)