ROBERT DAVID STEELE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hartley v. State, 129 So. 3d 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …So. 3d 543, 556 (Fla.2010). “Whether to grant a motion for judgment of acquittal hinges on the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial and what factual findings the jury could ‘fairly and reasonably infer’ from that evidence.” Grohs v. State, 944 So. 2d 450, 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Section 847.0135(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), provides: (3) CERTAIN USES OF COMPUTER SERVICES OR DEVICES PROHIBITED. — Any person who knowingly uses a computer online service, Internet service, local bulletin board ser…
• Debaun v. State, 213 So. 3d 747 (Fla. 2017)
  …hich the term “sexual intercourse” was used to describe homosexual conduct. E.g., Hawker v. State, 951 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (using the term “sexual intercourse” throughout the opinion to refer to conduct between two males); Grohs v. State, 944 So. 2d 450, 457 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (referring to “sexual intercourse” involving two males). Finally, we reject the suggestion that the rule of lenity in section 775.021(1), Florida Statutes, requires that we adopt the restricted definition of “sexual interco…
• Rocker v. State, 122 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
  …e.”). Stated another way, “[wjhether to grant a motion for judgment of acquittal hinges on the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial and what factual findings the jury could ‘fairly and reasonably infer’ from that evidence.” Grohs v. State, 944 So. 2d 450, 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). I recognize that the State cannot defeat a motion for judgment of acquittal by accepting the defendant’s. uncontradicted theory of the facts and simply arguing that a competing theory is equally reasonable. See Ginn v. Stat…

Authorities Cited

• Mamodou Ndow v. State, 864 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)