STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
WESLEY JOHNSON, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
WESLEY JOHNSON, APPELLEE
949 So. 2d 219
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The State appeals from an order which suppressed the appellee’s statement after he had invoked his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Because, however, it is uncon-troverted that the appellee’s statement was spontaneous, and not “deliberately elicited” by the police, we reverse the trial court’s suppression of same. See State v. Delgadillo, 458 So. 2d 20, 22 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), citing U.S. v. Henry, 447 U.S. 264, 100 S.Ct. 2183, 65 L.Ed.2d 115 (1980) and Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Ifergane, 114 So. 3d 190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…es intended to transfer interest in the insurance claim (Wilma/Venetian) from marital property to Haim If-ergane.”6 Thus, Alexandra’s assignment of the insurance claim to Haim was valid. Citizens points to Bethel v. Security National Insurance Co., 949 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), Allstate Insurance Co. v. Conde, 595 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Paulekas, 633 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), as prohibiting Alexandra’s dismissal from the underlying declaratory judgme…
-
Barcelona Hotel, LLC v. Nova Cas. Co., 57 So. 3d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…of persons or cargo. (Emphasis added). Thus, the definition of “mobile equipment” includes “vehicles” that are maintained primarily to provide mobility to permanently mounted shovels and diggers, i e. excavators. See Bethel v. Sec. Nat’l Ins. Co., 949 So. 2d 219, 222 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“When an insurer fails to define a term in a policy, the insurer cannot take the position that there should be a narrow, restrictive interpretation of the coverage provided.”); Abreu v. Lloyd’s, London, 877 So. 2d 834, 836 (…
-
GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. v. Edelmida and Paulino Rodriguez, 155 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…e term "court costs” is not defined in the policy. . See Tri-State Ins, Co. of Minn. v. Fitzgerald, 593 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Pac. Employers Ins. Co. v. Hofrichter, 670 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). . See Bethel v. Sec. Nat’l Ins. Co., 949 So. 2d 219, 223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (stating insurance policies are to be constructed in favor of the insured and insurance coverage); Rabatie v. U.S. Sec. Ins. Co., 581 So. 2d 1327, 1329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio v. Manchester, 3…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (U.S. 1964)
- United States v. Henry, 447 U.S. 264 (U.S. 1980)
- State v. Lizandro Delgadillo, 458 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)