JAMES KEELLINGS, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
MARK VALLERY, APPELLEE
JAMES KEELLINGS, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
MARK VALLERY, APPELLEE
952 So. 2d 1289
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises two points on appeal. First, he disputes the propriety of the lower court’s summary judgment that dismissed Mark Vallery as a party. Second, he challenges a partial summary judgment adjudicating certain factual issues in claims that remain pending against other parties. We affirm the summary judgment that dismissed Vallery. As to Appellant’s second point, we dismiss the appeal because it is premature.
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
TORPY, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Greenwood v. State, 51 So. 3d 1278 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…n for writ of habeas corpus in the appellate court is the appropriate way to challenge a trial court’s ruling on the conditions of pretrial release. See State ex rel. Scaldeferri v. Sandstrom, 285 So. 2d 409, 412-13 (Fla.1973); Hollander v. Crowder, 952 So. 2d 1289, 1289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Even though both defen [*1280] dants subsequently filed successful motions to reduce bond, the petition is not moot because the error is capable of repetition but evading review. See Kelley v. Rice, 800 So. 2d 247, 250 (Fl…
-
Riverocruz v. Ric L. Bradshaw, 964 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…spect to the amount of the bond, and simply set the amount in accordance with a bond schedule for each count, the trial court did not consider any factors required pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(b)(3). See Hollander v. Crowder, 952 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Good v. Wille, 382 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). We thus grant the petition and remand for the trial court to set a hearing as soon as practicable at which time the court shall consider the relevant criteria for setting a bond…