DANNY LEE ADAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
DEBORAH JO ZARATE, APPELLEE
DANNY LEE ADAMS, APPELLANT,
DEBORAH JO ZARATE, APPELLEE
955 So. 2d 49
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Danny Lee Adams, (“former husband”), appeals the trial court’s order approving the general master’s report and income deduction order awarding Debora Jo Za-rate, (“former wife”), child support payments. The former husband raises numerous points on appeal, but has failed to present a transcript of the proceedings or prepare a factual statement of the proceedings. Thus, the record presented is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. See Schmitt v. Maile, 946 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979). Accordingly, we must affirm.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Smith v. State, 929 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
- Schmitt v. Maile, 946 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)