KENNETH LEE STARLING, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Writ Of Mandamus cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The circuit court’s order denying Kenneth Lee Starling’s petition for writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that he should have sought relief by filing a petition for writ of mandamus is REVERSED. Richardson v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 924 So. 2d 908, 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)(stating that inmate may seek review of a Commission order revoking conditional release “by petitions for habeas corpus or mandamus filed in the circuit court.”). Upon remand, Starling should be given an opportunity to amend his petition for writ of habeas corpus to add an allegation that his conditional release was unlawfully revoked based upon the violation of a curfew condition which is imposed for crimes “committed on or after October 1, 1995,” section 947.1405(7)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), and his offense took place several years before that date. See King v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 898 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pro-Art Dental LAB, Inc. v. V-Strategic Grp., LLC, 986 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2008)…LEWIS, J. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. v. V-Strategic Group, LLC, 959 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), in which the [*1246] Fourth District certified conflict with the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Crocker v. Diland Corp., 593 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). The certified conflict involves the interaction of…1 / 3
-
Maite Toledo v. Escamilla, 962 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…s “exclusive original jurisdiction” over ejectment actions. See § 26.012(2)(f), Fla. Stat. (2004)(specifying that circuit courts have “exclusive original jurisdiction” over “actions of ejectment”); Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. v. V-Strategic Group, LLC, 959 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)(holding that pursuant to section 26.012(2)(f), Florida Statutes, circuit courts have exclusive original jurisdiction over ejectment actions). Thus, the county court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to determine whether Ms…
-
Ortiz v. The Fla. Parole Comm'n, 15 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…crimes in 1990. Under section 947.1405, Florida Statutes (1989), release on conditional release is mandatory for inmates who qualify. See Duncan v. Moore, 754 So. 2d 708, 710-11 (Fla.2000). The defendant relies on Starling v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 959 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), and King v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 898 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Those cases are not on point. In those cases the defendants claimed that the Parole Commission imposed the terms of subsection 947.1405(7), Florida Statutes…
Authorities Cited
- Richardson v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 924 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
- King v. The Fla. Parole Comm'n, 898 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)