GEORGE BROWN, PETITIONER,

v.

CAPTAIN JAMES R. WOODARD, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Malek v. Bright, 7 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
  …the parties sua sponte in this case, we treat the appeal in this case as one taken from nonfinal orders which determine the right to immediate possession of property under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii). See Greene v. Borsky, 961 So. 2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (stating that a sum of money is property to which Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) applies). We affirm the orders under review.…
• Higgins v. Ryan, 81 So. 3d 588 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
  …o such thing. It does not mention any amount to be paid for the purchase of stock. Cf. Malek v. Bright, 7 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (clarifying that a “sum of money” is property to which Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) applies); accord Greene v. Borsky, 961 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); see also Corzo v. Pineiro, 990 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (dismissing case where trial court did not “determine” party’s right of possession). Here, the parties’ respective claims to immediate possession remain subject to de…
• Tribeca Aesthetic Med. Solutions, LLC v. Edge Pilates Corp. & Bayou Meto, Inc., 82 So. 3d 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …suant to the statute. GROSS, C.J., and TAYLOR, J., concur. . Because the order determines the right to immediate possession of property, we have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii). See Greene v. Borsky, 961 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (an order determining the right to immediate possession of money is an appeal-able order under this rule). See also Fla. Discount Props., Inc. v. Windermere Condo., Inc., 763 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). . Although this cour…

Authorities Cited

• Drew C. Hartley v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 954 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
• Sullivan v. State, 954 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)