ROGELIO MALEK, ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

GEORGE BRIGHT, ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Trg-Brickell Point NE, Ltd v. Michael and Marsha Wajsblat, 34 So. 3d 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …he court’s uniform motion calendar, in the nature of a mandatory injunction, see Konover Realty Assocs. Ltd. v. Mladen, 511 So. 2d 705, 706 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), or an order of entitlement to immediate possession of property, see Malek v. Bright, 7 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). The plaintiffs, two hundred twenty-six in number, are the contract purchasers of one hundred eighty-seven condominium units in three condominium towers in Miami-Dade County. The defendants, TRG Brickell Point NE, Ltd., TRG Bricke…
• Higgins v. Ryan, 81 So. 3d 588 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
  …ng is critical as it relates to the amounts to be paid for the purchase of the stock in the company, among other related issues.” The order does no such thing. It does not mention any amount to be paid for the purchase of stock. Cf. Malek v. Bright, 7 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (clarifying that a “sum of money” is property to which Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) applies); accord Greene v. Borsky, 961 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); see also Corzo v. Pineiro, 990 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (dismissing case…
• All Seasons Condo Assoc. v. Patrician Hotel, 274 So. 3d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
  …hat determines the right to immediate possession of property because the trial court’s grant of specific performance concerned the immediate right to real property under the Master Purchase Agreement and Supplemental Contracts. See Malek v. Bright, 7 So. 3d 598, 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“Upon further review of the jurisdictional questions promulgated by this Court to the parties sua sponte in this case, we treat the appeal in this case as one taken from nonfinal orders which determine the right to immediate…

Authorities Cited

• Brown v. Captain James R. Woodard, 961 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)