JAMES CASEN, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES R. MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Mailbox Rule cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a petition for writ of mandamus filed in circuit court case numbers G.0601212032 and G.0660991. However, the clerk of the circuit court has certified that no such case files exist. Because there is no pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
Petitioner has tendered to this court a copy of the pleading which he asserts was filed below. This petition includes a date stamp on its face showing that it was given to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, within 30 days, petitioner shall file with the clerk of the circuit court a copy of the petition which includes the date stamp on the face of the pleading. See Rife v. State, 958 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Hartley v. Fla. Dep’t of Corrections, 954 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
PETITION DENIED.
BARFIELD, ALLEN, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Atwater v. City OF Cape Coral, 120 So. 3d 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…6 Based on prior court proceedings, NERS, at least [*601] in its corporate capacity, was aware of the procedures delineated in section 45.032 yet did not bring this to the courts’ attention. See, e.g., Nat’l Equity Recovery Servs., Inc. v. Williams, 962 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Moreover, NERS failed to inform the courts that it filed claims with the Department and the CFO for the funds in dispute and was either waiting for a ruling or had withdrawn the claim. Petitions for writs of prohibition granted;…
-
Brookins v. State, 49 So. 3d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…urt. However, the clerk of the circuit [*328] court has no record of ever receiving the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, because there is no pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Casen v. McDonough, 962 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Petitioner has tendered to this court a copy of the petition which he asserts was filed below. His petition includes a date stamp on its face showing that it was given to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, within 30 da…
-
Ingram v. State, 60 So. 3d 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…at he filed the motion in the circuit court in 2003; however, the circuit court has no record of ever receiving the motion. Accordingly, because there is no pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Casen v. McDonough, 962 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Petitioner alleges that he did timely place his pleading into the hands of prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, within 30 days of issuance of mandate in this cause, petitioner shall file with the clerk of the circuit cou…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Drew C. Hartley v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 954 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
- Sullivan v. State, 954 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
- Rife v. State, 958 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)