JAMES INGRAM, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Mailbox Rule cases and more on FLexlaw
This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for leave to supplement. Petitioner alleges that he filed the motion in the circuit court in 2003; however, the circuit court has no record of ever receiving the motion. Accordingly, because there is no pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Casen v. McDonough, 962 So.2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
Petitioner alleges that he did timely place his pleading into the hands of prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, within 30 days of issuance of mandate in this cause, petitioner shall file with the clerk of the circuit court a copy of the pleading. See Rife v. State, 958 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Hartley v. Fla. Dep’t of Corrections, 954 So.2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
PETITION DENIED.
WEBSTER, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Casen v. McDONOUGH, 962 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
- Drew C. Hartley v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 954 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
- Sullivan v. State, 954 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
- Rife v. State, 958 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)