HANNA MACOOL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HANNA MACOOL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
964 So. 2d 183
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Montoya v. State, 943 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Brooks v. State, 930 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), review granted, 948 So. 2d 758 (Fla.2007).
THOMPSON, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bartlett v. State, 972 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…ould never have testified had the statement been suppressed. Further, the State’s argument fails to understand the prejudicial impact of the “name-dropping” Bartlett engaged in, in an effort to make the charge go away. See generally McGill v. State, 964 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (granting postconviction relief where an attorney failed to move to suppress “exculpatory” statements, given in violation of [*226] Miranda, where the prejudice went to the credibility of the defendant’s current line of defense).…
Authorities Cited
- Brooks v. State, 930 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
- Barnes v. State, 948 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 2007)
- Montoya v. State, 943 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)