WILLIAM BRUNNER, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES R. MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Collateral Criminal Proceeding cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the circuit court’s denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. Specifically, petitioner challenges the circuit court’s order imposing a lien on his inmate trust account and its determination that he was provided with all process due during his prison disciplinary proceeding.
Since the underlying action constitutes a collateral criminal proceeding, the circuit court did not have statutory authority to impose a lien for court costs and filing fees. See Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So. 2d 361, 367 (Fla.2003); Crosby v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 949 So. 2d 1181, 1183 (Fla. 1 DCA 2007). Therefore, we GRANT this petition for writ of certiorari inasmuch as it contested the circuit court’s order imposing a lien and QUASH such order. However, we conclude that Petitioner’s due process claims are without merit. Consequently, we DENY that portion of the petition alleging due process violations.
BARFIELD, ALLEN, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McCOY v. State, 56 So. 3d 37 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…who have a valid prescription written directly on their behalf for the pills in their possession. O’Hara v. State, 964 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (extending the prescription defense to prosecutions involving trafficking charges); Smith v. State, 965 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). However, both appellant and the State concede there is no case in Florida interpreting the validity of the prescription defense in situations in which the prescription is found on another individual who may have an innocent expla…
Authorities Cited
- Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 2003)
- Crosby v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 949 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)