WILLIAM PLUMMER, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM PLUMMER, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
969 So. 2d 1158
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2007)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
William Plummer, Jr. seeks review of an order that disposed of his rule 3.800(a) motion. We remand for resentencing in connection with one point.
The trial court agreed with Plummer that the violent habitual offender and related mandatory minimum portion of his sentence should be stricken with respect to LT 04-11634. Brooks v. State, 837 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). In so doing, the court did not determine that a resentencing hearing was required. We remand for the trial court to conduct a de novo sentencing hearing. See Ross v. State, 901 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); see also Tumblin v. State, 965 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Granatino v. State, 965 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).
STONE, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Tavorris Tumblin v. State, 965 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
- Ross v. State, 901 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
- Bullard v. State, 837 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
- Brooks v. State, 837 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
- Lincoln Granatino v. State, 965 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)