ROBERT J. HANCOCK, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Kennan G. Dandar & Dandar & Dandar, P.A. v. Church of Scientology Flag Serv. Org., Inc., 190 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  ….; see also Estate of Williams v. Jursinski, 160 So. 3d 500, 501 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (concluding that, pursuant to Pino, the notice of voluntary dismissal “had the effect of immediately divesting the circuit court of jurisdiction”); Kelly v. Colston, 977 So. 2d 692, 694 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“The effect of a voluntary dismissal prior to submission is immediate, final, and irreversible. It terminates the litigation and instantaneously divests the court of its jurisdiction to .enter further orders.”); WM Specialt…
• Two Islands Dev. Corp. v. Clarke, 239 So. 3d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
• Sidman v. Marino, 46 So. 3d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …, Florida Statutes, each require, proof that modification of a parenting plan and time-sharing schedule is in the best interests of the child and is based upon a substantial, material, and unanticipated change in circumstances. See Kelly v. Colston, 977 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Krohn v. Foster, 856 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Buckingham v. Buckingham, 492 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Although the evidence may have shown that increasing the father’s time with the child is in the child’s best int…

Authorities Cited

• Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004)