ANDRE HOWELL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Affirmed conviction where trial court properly denied peremptory challenge based on juror's nonverbal behavior not observed by the court or supported by the record.
A peremptory challenge cannot be sustained on the basis of a juror's nonverbal behavior that is neither observed by the trial court nor supported by the record.
[1] A peremptory challenge based on a juror's nonverbal behavior cannot be sustained unless the behavior is observed by the trial court or otherwise supported by the record.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a potential juror's nonverbal behavior, the existence of which is disputed by opposing counsel and neither observed by the trial court nor otherwise supported by the record, is not a proper basis to sustain a peremptory challenge as genuinely race neutral”
Florida Supreme Court's holding in Dorsey v. State establishing the standard for evaluating peremptory challenges based on nonverbal conduct
Howell attempted to exercise a peremptory challenge against juror Maria Bermudez, claiming discomfort with how the juror was looking at him, but the t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jury Selection cases and more on FLexlaw
Andre Howell challenges his conviction on the basis of an error that occurred during jury selection. Because Howell’s reason for the peremptory challenge was based on how the juror was looking at him and the court did not observe this, under Dorsey v. State, 868 So.2d 1192 (Fla.2003), the stated reason was not supported by the record and was properly denied.
When Howell attempted to exercise a peremptory challenge of juror Maria Ber-mudez, the prosecutor requested a gender neutral reason. The trial court added that the juror was Hispanic. Defense counsel stated that their client expressed discomfort with the way the juror was looking at him. The judge said that he did not see that. As in Brown v. State, 995 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), that meant such nonverbal communication cannot support the strike, relying on Dorsey. In Dorsey, the Florida Supreme Court held that “a potential juror’s nonverbal behavior, the existence of which is disputed by opposing counsel and neither observed by the trial court nor otherwise supported by the record, is not a proper basis to sustain a peremptory challenge as genuinely race neutral.” Id. at 1202. Here, as in Dorsey, the defense relied on nonverbal conduct which neither the judge nor the prosecutor could confirm and is not supported by the record. Consequently, the proffered reason was not gender, or ethnically, neutral and the judge properly denied the challenge.
We therefore affirm.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Dorsey v. State, 868 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 2003)
- Brown v. State, 995 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)