RIDLEY OWENS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES L. RIDLEY, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND TAYLOR, COTTON & RIDLEY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND CLYDE A. OWENS, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2009-02-05
No. 1D08-5799
BARFIELD, ALLEN, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
1 So. 3d 1191 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December 6, 2008, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature. The order on appeal determines that the defendant is not liable with regard to Count I of the Third Amended Complaint. Count I was the sole claim pending between the appellant, Ridley Owens, Inc. and the sole defendant, James L. Ridley, Jr. Had the order on appeal properly entered judgment on Count I, the order would constitute a partial final judgment subject to immediate review. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(k). However, because the order merely determines entitlement to judgment on Count I, it does not rise to the level of finality necessary for appellate review. See Monticello Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 743 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, ALLEN, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Horn v. State, 190 So. 3d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …appeal of his judgment and sentence was pending. However, now that his appeal has been resolved, Horn v. State, 171 So. 3d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), we remand the case for the trial court to consider the motion on the merits. See Rightmire v. State, 1 So. 3d 1191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). REMANDED. LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw