DARIC JAMAHL GRIMES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DARIC JAMAHL GRIMES, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
10 So. 3d 674
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2009)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Hayes v. State, 780 So.2d 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Rumph v. State, 544 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
ORFINGER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
RAY v. State, 40 So. 3d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…nd transaction in a high drug area but did not see any drugs or money change hands). The State alternatively argues that Ray’s traffic infraction constituted the commission of a crime which justified the officer’s seizure of her. See D.A. v. State, 10 So. 3d 674, 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (stating that “a seizure is permissible if the seizing officer has probable cause to believe a traffic infraction has occurred.”). Further, the State asserts that the arresting officer’s activation of the lights on her police…
-
State v. Arevalo, 112 So. 3d 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…fic violation, it was reasonable for the deputy to call appellee back to issue a traffic citation or warning,3 and to then conduct “the customary driver’s license ... and active warrant checks that routinely accompany a traffic stop.” D.A. v. State, 10 So. 3d 674, 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). In summation, as we find that the deputy had probable cause to effect a traffic stop of appellee which included calling ap-pellee back to his vehicle, we reverse the order granting appellee’s motion to suppress and remand f…
-
Tripp v. State, 251 So. 3d 982 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
Authorities Cited
- Hayes v. State, 780 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
- Woods v. Ashlin, 544 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- Rumph v. State, 544 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)