BRUCE R. JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2009-08-19
No. 1D07-4469
BARFIELD, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
16 So. 3d 232 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2009) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has filed an appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record did not indicate any reversible error; therefore, we affirm the convictions and sentences. However, the trial court granted Appellant’s motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), with regard to the amount of jail credit to which Appellant was entitled without entering a corrected written judgment reflecting the new amount of jail credit. Thus, we remand for the trial court to enter a corrected written judgment accordingly.

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for entry of a corrected written judgment.

BARFIELD, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Sanders v. State, 35 So. 3d 864 (Fla. 2010)
    …r whether sentence points were properly scored on the Criminal Punishment Code (CPC) score-sheet used for sentences imposed upon the revocation of probation. We have for review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Sanders v. State, 16 So. 3d 232 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), in which the Second District certified a question to this Court to be of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. . See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have revised the question as follows: WHEN A DEFENDANT IS TO BE SENT…
  • Hubard v. State, 17 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
    …manded for resentencing at the recalculated “lowest permissible prison sentence.” At first glance, this argument would seem to have some merit. However, we conclude that consistent with the opinion recently issued by this court in Sanders v. State, 16 So. 3d 232 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), the trial court properly itemized the prostitution-related counts as additional offenses. See § 948.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2001) (“If probation ... is revoked, the court shall ... impose any sentence which it might have originally im…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw