N.R., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
N.R. appeals the final orders entered by the trial court adjudicating him delinquent and committing him to a high-risk, level 10 commitment program, rejecting the Department of Juvenile Justice’s (DJJ) recommended sentence of Level 6, moderate-risk commitment program. As the State properly concedes, reversal is required.
The Florida Supreme Court issued its opinion in E.A.R. v. State, 4 So.3d 614 (Fla.2009), while this appeal was in the pipeline. In that case, the Supreme Court set forth a more rigorous analysis for a trial court to follow before it can depart from DJJ’s recommendation regarding placement. Understandably, the trial court’s explanation for departing from the recommendation of the DJJ is not in accordance with this newly articulated standard. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the entry of an order which complies with the requirements of E.A.R.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
MONACO, C.J. and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. A.C., 44 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…ctive setting — and maintaining the ability of the State to protect the public from further acts of delinquency. Id. Furthermore, a trial court’s reasons for departure must be established by a preponderance of evidence. Id.; see also N.R. v. State, 22 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (reversing upward departure for noncompliance with E.A.R.). The State argues that the trial court failed to comply with E.A.R. because it did not give any reasons for departing from the DJJ’s recommendation. It further argues, l…
-
J.O. v. State, 42 So. 3d 803 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…ble over a proper objection1 only if: (1) the charging document includes all of the elements of the lesser; and (2) the evidence admitted would support a conviction on the lesser. See Brown v. State, 206 So. 2d 377, 388 (Fla.1968); Pittman v. State, 22 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); see also Neals v. State, 962 So. 2d 926, 928 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (finding no merit in defendant’s assertion that trial judge reversibly erred in refusing to charge jury on the offense of theft under section 812.014, where informa…1 / 2
-
Griffis v. Fla. Fish & Wildlife Conservation Comm'n, 57 So. 3d 929 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…or damage to coral reefs [*932] in state waters” imposed under sections 253.04(1), and (3)). 3. “[A] defendant may not be convicted of a crime that has not been charged by the State.” Jaimes v. State, 51 So. 3d 445 (Fla.2010). See Pittman v. State, 22 So. 3d 859, 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (Defendant chárged with sexual battery could not be convicted of lewd or lascivious battery as a lesser-included offense, where nothing in the information alleged that the victim was 12 or older but less than 16, although suc…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- E.A.R. v. State, 4 So. 3d 614 (Fla. 2009)