TYRONE L. LEONARD, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Leonard petitioned for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective appellate counsel for failing to challenge an illegal minimum mandatory sentence. The court held that appellate counsel should have challenged the ten-year minimum mandatory sentence imposed on Leonard's aggravated assault with a firearm conviction, as the applicable statute required only a three-year minimum mandatory sentence for that offense.
Appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the illegal minimum mandatory sentence. The trial court was required to impose a three-year, not ten-year, minimum mandatory sentence for aggravated assault with a firearm under Florida Statutes § 775.087(2)(a)(1). The sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.
[1] A ten-year minimum mandatory sentence is required for aggravated assault with a firearm when the defendant actually possessed a firearm, but a three-year minimum mandator…
[2] Ineffective assistance of appellate counsel can be established by counsel's failure to challenge an illegal minimum mandatory sentence.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“counsel should have challenged the imposition of an illegal minimum mandatory ten year sentence on Leonard's conviction for aggravated assault with a firearm”
Establishes the core holding that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the illegal sentence
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLeonard was convicted after a jury trial of attempted first degree murder with a firearm, shooting into an occupied vehicle, and aggravated assault wi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Aggravated Assault With A Firearm cases and more on FLexlaw
Leonard has filed a petition, alleging that his appellate counsel was ineffective. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), and conclude that counsel should have challenged the imposition of an illegal minimum mandatory ten year sentence on Leonard’s conviction for aggravated assault with a firearm.1
Leonard was convicted, after a jury trial, of attempted first degree murder with a firearm, shooting at, within, or into an occupied vehicle, and aggravated assault with a firearm. As to the aggravated assault count, the jury made a special finding that Leonard had actually possessed a firearm during the commission of the crime, but declined to find that he had discharged the firearm. He was sentenced to life in prison on the attempted murder charge, fifteen years on the second count, and a minimum mandatory ten year sentence on the aggravated assault with a firearm conviction. His sentences were to run concurrently. Leonard’s convictions and sentences were affirmed by this court without opinion. See Leonard v. State, 987 So.2d 91 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).
In his petition, Leonard correctly argues that the trial court was required to impose a three, not ten, year minimum mandatory sentence on his conviction for *787aggravated assault with a firearm. Section 775.087(2)(a)(l), Florida Statutes (2006), requires the imposition of a ten year minimum mandatory sentence for certain enumerated offenses and a three year minimum mandatory sentence for other enumerated offenses. See Figueroa-Montalvo v. State, 10 So.3d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). As to aggravated assault, a plain reading of the statute calls for imposition of a three year minimum mandatory prison sentence:
Any person who is convicted of a felony or an attempt to commit a felony, regardless of whether the use of a weapon is an element of the felony, and the conviction was for:
[enumerated offenses]
and during the commission of the offense, such person actually possessed a ‘firearm’ or ‘destructive device’ ... shall be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of 10 years, except that a person who is convicted for aggravated assault, possession of a firearm by a felon, or burglary of a conveyance shall be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of 3 years if such person possessed a ‘firearm’ or ‘destructive device’ during the commission of the offense. (emphasis added)
§ 775.087(2)(a)(l), Fla. Stat. (2006).
Because the State has provided the relevant trial records from which this court can conclude that the sentence imposed was illegal, a new appeal would be redundant. See Johnson v. Wainwright, 498 So.2d 938, 939 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence imposed on Leonard’s aggravated assault with a firearm conviction and remand for resentencing. The remainder of the issues raised in Leonard’s petition are without merit.
Petition GRANTED in part; DENIED in part; REMANDED.
ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Johnson v. Louie L. Wainwright, 498 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 1986)
- Figueroa-Montalvo v. State, 10 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)