PAUL POOLE, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF PORT ORANGE AND MHK OF VOLUSIA, ETC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the complaint adequately alleged a cause of action for failure to produce public records, reversing the dismissal of that count.
[1] A trial court's dismissal of a complaint with prejudice is reviewed de novo.
[2] In reviewing a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, a court must consider only the complaint's text, draw all inferences in favor of the plaintiff, and accep…
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePoole requested appraisals related to the City's land purchase negotiations from the City. The City refused to produce the appraisals. Poole sued, all…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Public Records Act cases and more on FLexlaw
Poole appeals from an order dismissing his second amended complaint against the City of Port Orange (the “City”) and MHK of Volusia County, Inc. (“MHK”) with prejudice. We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Counts I, III, and IV without discussion, but find that Count II adequately alleged a cause of action against the City for failure to produce public records.
The standard of review for the dismissal of a complaint with prejudice is de novo. Fox v. Prof'l Wrecker Operators of Fla., Inc., 801 So.2d 175, 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). In determining whether a complaint properly states a cause of action upon which relief can be granted, a court must confine its review to the four corners of the complaint, draw all inferences in favor of the pleader, and accept as true all well-pled allegations. Id.
In Count II of his second amended complaint, Poole alleged that some time prior to March 22, 2007, the City commenced negotiations to purchase a 440-acre parcel of land from MHK. These negotiations culminated in a purchase agreement which was approved by the Port Orange City Commission in early or mid-December 2007. In conjunction with the negotiations, the City obtained two appraisals regarding the subject parcel. On November 6, 2007 and December 5, 2007, Poole requested that the City’s records’ custodian produce copies of these appraisals. Count IPs prayer for relief requested that the trial court enter an order requiring the City to produce the two appraisals for inspection and copying.
The trial court’s dismissal of Count II appears to be based on a belief that the count failed to adequately state a claim for mandamus. Although not a model of clarity, we conclude that Poole’s second amended complaint adequately alleged the elements of a mandamus claim.
*741Mandamus is a common law remedy used to enforce an established legal right by compelling a person in an official capacity to perform an indisputable ministerial duty required by law. Puckett v. Gentry, 577 So.2d 965, 967 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). To state a cause of action for mandamus, a party must allege a clear legal right to performance of the act requested, an indisputable legal duty, and the lack of an adequate remedy at law. Radford v. Brock, 914 So.2d 1066, 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Mandamus is an appropriate remedy to compel a city’s timely production of public records. Town of Manalapan v. Rechler, 674 So.2d 789, 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Here, Poole’s second amended complaint adequately alleged each of these elements. As to the indisputable legal duty, Poole alleged that the appraisals were public records that were required, pursuant to section 119.07, Florida Statutes (2007),1 and section 166.045, Florida Statutes (2007),2 to be produced to a member of the public upon request. Town of Manalapan, 674 So.2d at 790 (production of requested public records is ministerial duty as it is a duty imposed by Chapter 119). Poole adequately alleged a clear legal right to performance given his allegations that the City refused to produce these documents, although twice requested by Poole to do so. Finally, Poole specifically alleged that he had no other legal remedy which would be effective to obtain the requested appraisals.3 Accordingly, we find that the trial court erred in dismissing Count II of Poole’s second amended complaint.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.
MONACO, C.J. and GRIFFIN, J„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (44 total)
-
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Lippi, 78 So. 3d 81 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)…e court dismissed Deutsche Bank’s second amended complaint with prejudice, struck Deutsche Bank’s pleadings, and entered a judgment in favor of Lippi. An order dismissing a complaint with prejudice is reviewed de novo. Poole v. City of Port Orange, 33 So. 3d 739, 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). “In determining whether a complaint properly states a cause of action upon which relief can be granted, a court must confine its review to the four corners of the complaint, draw all inferences in favor of the pleader, and…
-
Seigler v. Bell, 148 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…evoke the temporary custody order. “Mandamus is a common law remedy used to enforce an established legal right by compelling a person in an official capacity to perform an indisputable ministerial duty required by law.” Poole v. City of Port Orange, 33 So. 3d 739, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (citing Puckett v. Gentry, 577 So. 2d 965, 967 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)). “To state a cause of action for mandamus, a party must allege a clear legal right to performance of the act requested, an indisputable legal duty, and the…
-
Brown v. State, 93 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…So. 3d 1180,1181 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Mandamus is a remedy used to enforce an established legal right by compelling a person in an official capacity to perform an indisputable ministerial duty [*1196] required by law. Poole v. City of Port Orange, 33 So. 3d 739, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). If a petition for writ of mandamus shows a prima facie case for relief, the court shall issue an alternative writ in mandamus to which the defendant in the mandamus proceeding shall respond as provided in Florida Rule of Ci…
Previewing 3 of 44 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- FOX v. Prof'l Wrecker Operators OF Fla., Inc., 801 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Radford v. Brock, 914 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
- The Town OF Manalapan v. Morton Rechler and Beverly Rechler, 674 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Puckett v. Gentry, 577 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
- Shea v. Sheriff Ron Cochran & Broward Cnty. Sheriffs Off., 680 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- J.G. v. State, 680 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)