CESAR RUANO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CESAR RUANO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
35 So. 3d 1031
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
While appellant Cesar Ruano argues on appeal that the prosecution improperly asked him on cross-examination whether another witness was lying, of., Knowles v. State, 632 So.2d 62, 65-66 (Fla.1993), the objection at trial was on the basis of “form” and “argumentative.” Because the defense failed to object on the basis that the prosecutor improperly asked Ruano whether he thought that a witness was lying, the issue was not preserved for appeal.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
See Harrell v. State (9th Cir. Ct. App. Div. 2010)
Authorities Cited
- Knowles v. State, 632 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 1993)