ERIC URSCHER, PETITIONER,
v.
WALTER A. MCNEIL, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2010-03-05
No. 1D10-0504
DAVIS, BENTON, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
37 So. 3d 287 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. Baldwin v. Crosby, 905 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Jenkins v. State, 957 So.2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

DAVIS, BENTON, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Moustafa Farghali v. Farghali, 187 So. 3d 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …r, “[i]f the substance of a provision requiring payment is found to be in the nature of support, rather than an exchange for a property interest, the failure to make the payment may be enforced by the remedy of civil contempt.” Cummings v. Cummings, 37 So. 3d 287, 290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). In this case, the payments were ordered as part of an equitable distribution scheme, not alimony or support. As such, the payments are not enforceable by contempt. Conclusion We affirm the trial court’s February 2014 fina…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw