EDWARD L. BROWN, PETITIONER,

v.

WALTER A. MCNEIL, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Wilber Rodriguez v. State, 223 So. 3d 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
  …fendant is, therefore, bound by these answers. See Alfred v. State, 71 So. 3d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (holding that Alfred’s claim that counsel coached him to lie during the plea colloquy did not require an évidentiary hearing); Smith v. State, 41 So. 3d 1037 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (holding that “[wjhere a defendant enters a plea and swears that he is satisfied with his counsel’s advice, he may not later attack counsel’s effectiveness for failure to investigate or defend the charge”); Davis v. State, 938 So…
• Edwardo De Juan v. State, 249 So. 3d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
• Gerod Lekeith Studemire v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2020)
  …as satisfied with counsel’s representation. “Where a defendant enters a plea and swears that he is satisfied with his counsel’s advice, he may not later attack counsel’s effectiveness for failure to investigate or defend the charge.” Smith v. State, 41 So. 3d 1037, 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). And so the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it found that Studemire’s arguments related to his counsel failed to provide good cause for withdrawal of his plea. Studemire next argued that the trial court shou…