AZAR OSMANOVIC, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AZAR OSMANOVIC, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
46 So. 3d 102
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with the well reasoned report and recommendation of the special master, the petition seeking a belated appeal of the order rendered on or about August 6, 2009, denying petitioner’s motion to correct illegal sentence in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-2007-CF-002008-XXXX, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(5)(D).
WOLF, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Christian v. State, 84 So. 3d 437 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)…obinson, the Third District has also repeatedly held that new criminal conduct constitutes a substantive violation of youthful offender probation, irrespective of whether the conduct results in new charges or convictions. See, e.g., Flores v. State, 46 So. 3d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), rev. granted, 58 So. 3d 260 [*440] (Fla.2011); Morency v. State, 955 So. 2d 67, 68 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). On appeal, however, Christian argues that our holding in Robinson should be viewed as conflicting with Rogers v. State,…
-
Ocelyn ST. CYR v. State, 106 So. 3d 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…7, 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing Boynton v. State, 896 So. 2d 898, 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)). The confusion was clarified by the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Christian v. State, 84 So. 3d 437, 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). See also Flores v. State, 46 So. 3d 102, 104-05 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), rev. dismissed, 93 So. 3d 324 (Fla.2012). A defendant need not have been charged or convicted of the new offense constituting the substantive violation in order for a court to sentence a youthful offender in excess of th…
-
Jacques v. State, 95 So. 3d 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…present for correction of the sentence. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions. . The' fact that these new charges were nolle prossed by the Slate at a later date does not affect this determination. See Flores v. State, 46 So. 3d 102, 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (recognizing that the trial court may find a substantive violation of probation "even when the new charges are nolle prossed or dismissed”); Morency v. State, 955 So. 2d 67, 68 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ("A new criminal offense…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence