TOMMY BERNARD JACKSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 2010-11-12
No. 5D10-2877
GRIFFIN, EVANDER, and JACOBUS JJ., concur.
47 So. 3d 378 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Tommy Jackson petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus based upon a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for failure to file a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). He claims his attorney should have challenged the legality of his drug offender probation. We agree.

Jackson was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, which is not one of the enumerated offenses for which drug offender probation can be imposed under section 948.20, Florida Statutes (2007). Therefore, we grant Jackson’s petition and remand to the lower court so that Jackson’s drug offender probation can be converted to regular probation with or without special conditions, as the court deems appropriate. See Taylor v. State, 17 So.3d 310, 311 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); State v. Roper, 915 So.2d 622, 623-24 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

PETITION GRANTED and CAUSE REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER, and JACOBUS JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. State, 71 So. 3d 246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …Berry v. State, 46 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). However, our review of the motion and the State’s response supports Smith’s position that his challenge to his drug offender probation is not successive and is facially sufficient. Jackson v. State, 47 So. 3d 378 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). The State concedes that the case should be remanded so that Smith’s drug offender probation can be converted to regular probation with any appropriate conditions, as determined by the trial court. Within another point, Smith ch…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw