STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
LAVARESS HOPKINS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a juvenile detained in a juvenile facility can be charged with battery on a detainee, and the trial court erred in dismissing the charges.
The State charged a juvenile with battery on a detainee. The juvenile moved to dismiss, arguing precedent prohibited such charges for juveniles in det…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
The State appeals an order dismissing a juvenile case for battery on a detainee.1 The State argues the court erred in dismissing the charges. We agree and reverse.
*975The State charged the defendant with battery by a detainee in violation of sections 784.03 and 784.082, Florida Statutes (2009). The defendant filed a motion to dismiss, relying on T.C. v. State, 852 So.2d 276, 276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), and argued that “[a]n alleged battery occurring at the hands of a juvenile detained in the juvenile detention facility cannot under the law be charged as battery by detainee.” When the trial court asked the State for case law in opposition to the motion, the State did not provide any cases for the court.
Although the trial court disagreed with T.C., without having any case law to support the charge, the trial court felt compelled to dismiss the case. See Bunkley v. State, 882 So.2d 890 (Fla.2004); Pardo v. State, 596 So.2d 665 (Fla.1992). The trial court urged the State to appeal, which it has.
We have de novo review of this dismissal order. State v. Powell, 974 So.2d 586, 588 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
The trial court’s instinct was correct. Eleven years ago in J.A. v. State, 743 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), we affirmed a trial court order adjudicating a juvenile guilty of battery upon a fellow detainee. Similarly, in J.A.D. v. State, 855 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), the Fifth District Court of Appeal reached the same conclusion. Unfortunately, the State did not provide the trial court with these opinions at the time of the hearing on the motion to dismiss. We therefore reverse and remand the case for reinstatement of the charges.
Reversed and Remanded.
POLEN, J., and GATES, MICHAEL L., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Laveress Hopkins v. State, 105 So. 3d 470 (Fla. 2012)…QUINCE, J. Laveress Hopkins seeks review of the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in State v. Hopkins, 47 So. 3d 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in T.C. v. State, 852 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), on a question of law. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Pardo v. State, 596 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1992)
- Bunkley v. State, 882 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 2004)
- T.C. v. State, 852 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
- J.A.D. v. State, 855 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
- Rosado v. Ibet Norma Rosado, 855 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
- State v. Jettinghoff, 743 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
- J.A. v. State, 743 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
- State v. Isac Powell, 974 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)