W. E. DOWLING, INDIVIDUALLY, AND TRADING AS DOWLING AUTO SALES, AND HIS WIFE, MARGIE M. DOWLING, APPELLANTS,
v.
FLORIDA BANK AT STARKE, A BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
W. E. DOWLING, INDIVIDUALLY, AND TRADING AS DOWLING AUTO SALES, AND HIS WIFE, MARGIE M. DOWLING, APPELLANTS,
FLORIDA BANK AT STARKE, A BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
101 So. 2d 414
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made, that it is manifest that there was substantial competent evidence to support the Chancellor’s decree, and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
STURGIS, C. J., WIGGINTON, J., and WILLIS, BEN C., A. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Babe's Plumbing, Inc. v. Emil P. Maier and Hildegarde M. Maier, 194 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)…ll the appellee be under any obligation to supply such deficiency by including in his appendix matter that should have been included in the appendix of the appellant.” This Court, in Urban v. City of Daytona Beach, Florida (2nd Dist. Court of App.) 101 So. 2d 414, pronounced that “ * * * anything short of substantial compliance with the rule relating to the form and content of the appendix will constitute such a material violation as will justify the appellate court in affirming the judgment, order or decre…
-
Carol City Utils., Inc. v. Dade Cnty., 183 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)…he Florida Appellate Rules committed by petitioner in its presentation of this matter. These violations dictate denial of the petition under authority of Farina v. Farina, Fla.App.1957, 97 So. 2d 485 and Urban v. City of Daytona Beach, Fla.App.1958, 101 So. 2d 414.” Thereafter, the Circuit Court proceeded to discuss the merits of the case. Upon an appeal to the Supreme Court of Florida, from the order denying certiorari, the appellant, Utility, attempted to argue error upon the Circuit Court’s determina [*2…
-
Boye v. Jodean P. Cash, 160 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…ories are related to the allegations of the complaint. Reversed and remanded with directions. . Vaughn v. Smith, Fla.1957, 96 So. 2d 143; Dicks v. Colonial Finance Corporation, Fla.1956, 85 So. 2d 874; Urban v. City of Daytona Beach, Fla.App.1958, 101 So. 2d 414. . Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S. Ct. 385, 91 L.Ed. 451. See Charles Sales Corp. v. Rovenger, Fla.1956, 88 So. 2d 551, for applicability of Federal Jurisprudence in this area.…