MARSH

v.

SARASOTA COUNTY

Citator

Cited By

• Greene v. Massey, 384 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1980)
  …tute the law of the case nor the basis of the ultimate decision unless concurred in by a majority of the Court. Lindsay v. Cotton, 123 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960); Ephrem v. Phillips, 99 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957) (on rehearing), cert. denied, 101 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1958). The situation here is unlike that in Carter v. Sparkman, 335 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 1976), where a majority of the Court joined in both the opinion of Justice Roberts and the concurring opinion of Justice England. In Sosa v. State, 215 So. 2…
• Allstate Ins. Co. v. Gillespie, 455 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …s for the first time on appeal. Procedural irregularities to which no objection is made are waived. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dilenge, 312 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Marsh v. Sarasota County, 97 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957), cert. denied, 101 So. 2d 816 (Fla.1958). In summary, we affirm in all respects the lower court’s judgment, holding that there is competent, substantial evidence in the record and law to support it. We hold that, under these facts, Allstate’s policy provides coverage to Stewart…
• Safeco Title Ins. Co. v. Reynolds, 452 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …t plead for such special damages in their breach of title insurance contract claim.5 Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.120; J. Ray Arnold Lumber Corp. v. Richardson, 105 Fla. 204, 141 So. 133 (1932); Ephrem v. Phillips, 99 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957), cert. denied, 101 So. 2d 816 (Fla.1958). Accordingly, because it appears from all the evidence presented at trial that the damages awarded by the jury on the first count are “grossly excessive,” we grant a remittitur for the amount of the elearly definable excess of $26,000.00…

Authorities Cited

• Marsh v. Sarasota Cnty., 97 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957)