JETHRO SENAT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2011-06-10
No. 2D10-440
WHATLEY and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
62 So. 3d 1236 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Topics
Scrivener'S Error Violation Of Probation

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Scrivener'S Error cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Judge.

BLACK, Judge.

Jethro Senat appeals the trial court’s order revoking his probation for leaving the county of his residence without permission (condition number three) and committing the new law violation of corruption by threat against a public servant (condition number five). We affirm without comment the trial court’s order; however, we remand with directions to correct a scrivener’s error.

The trial court orally found that Senat violated conditions three and five of his probation, but the written order reflects that Senat violated conditions two, five, and special condition x. To avoid future confusion, the discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written order requires that the order be corrected to reflect the specific conditions of the probation violation. See Feezel v. State, 463 So.2d 1244,1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

WHATLEY and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cooper v. State, 137 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …e revocation of his probation and his resulting prison sentences. We affirm the revocation of his probation and his sentences without comment, but we remand for the correction of two scrivener’s errors in the order of revocation. See Senat v. State, 62 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). The order states that Cooper admitted the violations and that he violated conditions “1, 2, 5, 9, [and] 11,” but the record reflects that Cooper did not admit the violations and that the trial court found Cooper in violation of c…
  • Gonzalez v. State, 176 So. 3d 993 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
    …ect a scrivener’s error. The order of revocation states that Gonzalez violated condition three of his probation; on remand, it should be corrected to reflect that the trial court orally found that Gonzalez violated condition one. See Senat v. State, 62 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Affirmed; remanded with directions. NORTHCUTT and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.…
  • Cherenfant v. State, 148 So. 3d 500 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …e revocation of his probation without comment but remand for the trial court to strike the violation of condition fourteen from the order of revocation because the trial court orally found that this violation had not been proven. See Senat v. State, 62 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Affirmed; remanded with directions. ALTENBERND and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw