WILLIE JAMES COOPER, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Willie James Cooper, III, appeals the revocation of his probation and his resulting prison sentences. We affirm the revocation of his probation and his sentences without comment, but we remand for the correction of two scrivener’s errors in the order of revocation. See Senat v. State, 62 So.3d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). The order states that Cooper admitted the violations and that he violated conditions “1, 2, 5, 9, [and] 11,” but the record reflects that Cooper did not admit the violations and that the trial court found Cooper in violation of condition 3 (not condition 2) ■ along with *570conditions 1, 5, 9, and 11. On remand, the trial court is directed to correct the order.
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
ALTENBERND and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dennewitz v. State, 192 So. 3d 662 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…ewd and lascivious act on a child, whereas he was serving probation on only one count of handling and fondling and one count of lewd and lascivious act. On remand, the trial court shall enter a corrected revocation order. See, e.g., Cooper v. State, 137 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (remanding for trial court to correct scrivener’s errors in the revocation order). Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions. KELLY and BLACK, JJ., Concur. .In 2004, Dennewitz appealed his third revocation…
Authorities Cited
- Jethro Senat v. State, 62 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
- Fidensio Gallegos v. State, 62 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)