GEORGE MANN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GEORGE MANN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
62 So. 3d 1240
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
We affirm George Mann’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon without comment. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error apparent on the face of the written judgment. While the record reflects that Mann was convicted of robbery with a weapon, the written judgment erroneously indicates he was convicted of robbery with a firearm. See Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173, 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Carter v. State, 32 So.3d 67, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).
Judgment and sentence affirmed; remanded with instructions.
DAVIS and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harrell v. State, 76 So. 3d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…of ag [*354] gravated battery with great bodily harm, this conviction is not reflected in the written judgment. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to enter a written judgment that correctly reflects Harrell’s convictions. See Mann v. State, 62 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Willingham v. State, 48 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Affirmed; remanded with instructions. LaROSE and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.…
-
Sutton v. State, 90 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…we find no basis on which to reverse or remand the judgment for correction. Cf. Harrell v. State, 76 So. 3d 358 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (remanding for the trial court to enter a written judgment correctly reflecting Harrell’s convictions); Mann v. State, 62 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (remanding to correct a written judgment erroneously indicating that Mann was convicted of robbery with a firearm, rather than robbery with a weapon); Ellis v. State, 855 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (remanding because the writte…
-
Tjavi Devon McKNIGHT v. State, 198 So. 3d 974 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…n count two. Therefore, we remand for correction of the scrivener’s error on the written judgment on count two to correctly reflect a conviction for simple possession of cocaine. See Harrell v. State, 76 So. 3d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Mann v. State, 62 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Affirmed; remanded with instructions. LUCAS and BADALAMENTI, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Willingham v. State, 48 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
- Aurelius v. State, 48 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
- Carter v. State, 32 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
- Dixon v. State, 32 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)