OTIS EUGENE HARRELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attempted Robbery With A Firearm cases and more on FLexlaw
Otis Eugene Harrell challenges his convictions and sentences for attempted robbery with a firearm and aggravated battery with great bodily harm. We affirm his convictions and sentences without comment. However, we remand for the trial court to correct scrivener’s errors which appear on the face of the written judgment.
The written judgment erroneously reflects that Harrell entered a guilty plea and was convicted of robbery with a firearm, rather than attempted robbery with a firearm. Additionally, while the transcript reflects that Harrell was convicted of ag*354gravated battery with great bodily harm, this conviction is not reflected in the written judgment. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to enter a written judgment that correctly reflects Harrell’s convictions. See Mann v. State, 62 So.3d 1240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).
Affirmed; remanded with instructions.
LaROSE and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tjavi Devon McKNIGHT v. State, 198 So. 3d 974 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…d-degree felony of simple possession of cocaine on count two. Therefore, we remand for correction of the scrivener’s error on the written judgment on count two to correctly reflect a conviction for simple possession of cocaine. See Harrell v. State, 76 So. 3d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Mann v. State, 62 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Affirmed; remanded with instructions. LUCAS and BADALAMENTI, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Willingham v. State, 48 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
- Aurelius v. State, 48 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
- Mann v. State, 62 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)