KEITH LANDI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2011-08-30
No. 5D10-3540
SAWAYA, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.
68 So. 3d 389 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Burgos, 994 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Aguilar v. State, 700 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); State v. Navarro, 464 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); see also, U.S. v. Montague, Slip Op., 2010 WL 3294283 (S.D.Fla. Aug. 20, 2010); but cf. Regalado v. State, 25 So.3d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

SAWAYA, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Parise v. Selph, 175 So. 3d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …ition to the petition for injunction, including the testimony of his law enforcement officer witness. We recognized in Furry v. Rickles that “[pjarties are entitled to a full hearing prior to the trial court issuing a permanent [*390] injunction.” 68 So. 3d 389, 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing § 741.30, Fla. Stat.). At an injunction hearing, due process requires that the parties have a reasonable opportunity to prove or disprove the allegations made in the complaint, including “allowing relevant testimony…
  • Schmigel v. Carson Wade Schmigel (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw