WASHINGTON LOUIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Habitual Felony Offender Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
We affirm the denial of appellant’s successive motion to correct an illegal sen*916tence. He claims that the court failed to re-pronounce him a habitual felony offender before sentencing him upon violation of probation, which he claims violates double jeopardy under State v. Akins, 69 So.3d 261 (Fla.2011). He made a similar claim that the trial court failed to pronounce him a habitual offender in the appeal of the denial of his prior motion to correct an illegal sentence. We found then, as we find now, that the trial court did sufficiently pronounce him a habitual offender. See Saffold v. State, 959 So.2d 1247, 1248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Zink v. State, 943 So.2d 895, 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Scanes v. State, 876 So.2d 1238, 1239-40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), rev. denied, 892 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2004); Fitzpatrick v. State, 884 So.2d 981, 982 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Yates v. State, 823 So.2d 273, 274-75 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), rev. denied, 842 So.2d 848 (Fla. 2003).
Affirmed.
MAY, C.J., WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Akins, 69 So. 3d 261 (Fla. 2011)
- State v. West, 892 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 2005)
- Scanes v. State, 876 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
- Yates v. State, 823 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
- Zink v. State, 943 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
- Dep't OF Child. & Families v. In the Interest of J.F., 959 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
- Haynes v. State, 884 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
- Fitzpatrick v. State, 884 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)