FRANK GUZMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2011-11-09
No. 2D10-1637
DAVIS and CRENSHAW, JJ, Concur.
100 So. 3d 74 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
LaROSE, Judge.

LaROSE, Judge.

Frank Guzman appeals the revocation of his probation. We affirm the revocation and sentence without further discussion. However, we strike the portion of the amended revocation order finding a violation of condition (25). The record reflects that the State withdrew the amended affidavit that alleged a violation of condition (25). The trial court revoked Mr. Guzman’s probation based solely on violation of condition (8).

Affirmed.

DAVIS and CRENSHAW, JJ, Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Roberts v. State, 115 So. 3d 360 (Fla. 2013)
    …PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Roberts v. State, 100 So. 3d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 86 So. 3d 1114 (Fla.2012) (table), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), of the Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we conclude that we should exercise our discretion and decline review. According…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw