DWIGHT ROBERTS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2013-05-23
No. SC11-2567
POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
115 So. 3d 360 Florida Supreme Court (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Roberts v. State, 100 So.3d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 86 So.3d 1114 (Fla.2012) (table), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), of the Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we conclude that we should exercise our discretion and decline review. Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …, only to discharge it after full review of the case. Id. at 251-52. This is similar to cases in which the supreme court initially accepts discretionary jurisdiction, only to discharge it later as improvidently granted. See, e.g., Brantley v. State, 115 So. 3d 360, 361 (Fla.2013). In this case, the first certified question asks whether Simon abrogated the English rule of priorities in assign- [*1054] merits. Simon addressed the English rule and rejected its application to PIP claims, due to the statutory req…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw