CHASE HOME LOANS, LLC, APPELLANT,
v.
HILARIO SOSA, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Chase Home Loans appeals the trial court's order vacating a residential foreclosure sale based on the debtor's unsworn allegations that his wife hid foreclosure notices under a sofa. The appellate court reversed, holding that unsworn statements cannot support relief from judgment under Rule 1.540(b) and that a party's potential mental incapacity does not constitute excusable neglect justifying vacation of a final foreclosure judgment.
The court reversed the order vacating the foreclosure sale, holding that unsworn representations by counsel lack evidentiary weight absent a stipulation and that even a party's potential mental incapacity does not constitute mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect sufficient to warrant relief from a final judgment under Rule 1.540(b).
[1] Unsworn allegations by counsel lack evidentiary weight for establishing facts in the absence of a stipulation.
[2] A party's potential mental incapacity, without more, does not establish mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect sufficient to vacate a final judgment.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“unsworn representations of counsel about factual matters do not have any evidentiary weight in the absence of a stipulation”
Establishes the fundamental evidentiary principle that defeats the husband's motion—unsworn allegations cannot support relief from judgment
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChase Home Loans obtained a foreclosure judgment against Hilario Sosa and his wife for approximately $26,500. The summons and complaint were lawfully …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Civil Procedure 1.540(B) Relief From Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal from an order vacating a residential foreclosure sale on the basis of unsworn allegations by a husband that his wife, a co-signatory with him on the foreclosed mortgage, “actively concealed” the proceeding by hiding all notifications under the family sofa. There is no issue as to service of process. Process was served lawfully on the husband’s seventy-eight-year-old mother-in-law, who trustingly handed the summons and complaint over to her daughter. The husband, represented on this appeal by his daughter, asserts this is one of several bizarre acts concerning the family finances that have come to light since the foreclosure sale, which has led the family to conclude the wife is mentally disturbed. The amount of the foreclosure judgment is a mere $26,500, which the husband asserts he is ready to pay in full. The motion to vacate the foreclosure sale was opposed below and continues to be opposed here by a bona fide third-party purchaser at the sale, Chase Home Loans, LLC. We reverse the order of the trial court.
The husband’s motion was brought under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b), which permits a trial court to relieve a party or a party’s legal representative from a final judgment, decree or order based upon mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect. However, as we often have said, unsworn representations of counsel about factual matters do not have any evidentiary weight in the absence of a stipulation. See Lazcar Int’l, Inc. v. Caraballo, 957 So.2d 1191, 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (citing State v. Bauman, 425 So.2d 32, 35 n. 3 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)). “It is of no moment in establishing facts that attorneys are ‘officers of the court’ as we often read when an unsworn representation is made.” Bauman, 425 So.2d at 35 n. 3. Nor is the fact that the wife may have been the subject of some undetected “degree of mental incapacity” during the course of the foreclosure action. Even if true, this does not create a sufficient showing of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect to warrant vacating a final judgment. John Crescent, Inc. v. Schwartz, 382 So.2d 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); see also Am. Natl Bank v. Lau, 268 So.2d 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972).
We have no doubt the trial court’s motivation in reaching its decision was inspired by benevolence and compassion for the family. We also are mindful that in equity jurisdiction there is some play in the joints. John Crescent, Inc., 382 So.2d at 386. However, as we recently have said, “[a] trial court is not free to refuse to follow the law because of some personal disinclination or otherwise.” TBOM Mortg. Holding LLC v. Brown, 59 So.3d 322, 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (citing Republic Fed. Bank, N.A. v. Doyle, 19 So.3d 1053, 1054 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (stating that “no judicial action of any kind can rest on such a foundation”).
*1242We reverse the order vacating the judicial sale in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
MTGLQ Invs., L.P. v. Merrill, 312 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)
-
Reina I. Echevarria and Jorge Echevarria v. Lennar Homes, LLC, 306 So. 3d 327 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
-
Chase Fin. Servs., LLC. v. Edelsberg, 129 So. 3d 1139 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), “we [are not] cognizant of[ ] any authority which would support the proposition that a party can gain relief from a judicial sale solely by reference to that party’s own lack of diligence.” See Chase Home Loans, LLC., v. Sosa, 104 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (concluding that mortgagor’s wife’s alleged mental instability was insufficient to constitute mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, that would support a motion to vacate a foreclosure sale where the mortgagor clai…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- John Crescent, Inc. v. Schwartz, 382 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
- Lazcar Int'l, Inc. v. Caraballo, 957 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
- Republic Fed. Bank, N.A. v. Doyle, 19 So. 3d 1053 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
- Am. Nat'l Bank v. LAU, 268 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
- State v. Bauman, 425 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
- Tbom Mortg. Holding, LLC v. Brown, 59 So. 3d 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)